Ask your Parish or Town Council to vote for 20mph

20s plenty for us20’s Plenty for Us is asking Parish and Town Councils in Hertfordshire to pass a motion to support the campaign for 20mph where people live, work and play.  Each local council that does will help:

  • Achieve a 20mph speed limit on roads, with exceptions where 30mph is demonstrably safe, particularly for vulnerable road users.
  • Demonstrate to the Highways Authority the demand for 20mph county-wide, making it both cheaper and easier to implement across the county and achieving better driver compliance.

Speed limits are set by Hertfordshire as the Highway Authority, which also makes Traffic Regulation Orders to erect signs or change other road features like paint roundels or remove centre lines.  Demonstrating widespread local community support is critical to securing the County’s agreement to implement 20mph widely.  Other counties, such as Lancashire and Sefton in England, have agreed 20mph for every settlement, as have counties throughout Wales. Scotland has promised to offer 20mph widely and places like Warrington have 20mph in all their satellite villages.

Motion

 Walkern Parish Council

  • Supports the 20’s Plenty for Hertfordshires campaign;
  • Calls on Hertfordshire County Council to implement 20mph in Walkern; and
  • Will write to Hertfordshire County Council to request 20mph speed limits on streets throughout Hertfordshire where people live, work, shop, play or learn, with 30mph as the exception on those roads, where full consideration of the needs of vulnerable road users allows a higher limit.

Please contact Walkern Parish Council if you would like this scheme to be adopted in Walkern

Background information on 20mph speed limits

  1. Accepted as normal by local authorities where 25m people in the UK live, including the whole of Wales and (soon) Scotland. 20mph is global best practice where people mix with motor traffic.
  2. Popular: Government and other surveys consistently find 70% support in residential streets which rises after 20mph limits are introduced.
  3. Affordable and cost effective, with multiple societal, environmental, economic, and climate benefits.
  4. Prioritise quality of life: 20mph helps to create places where human activity, including walking, cycling and social interaction, takes precedence over traffic.
  5. Safer: The UK’s Department for Transport estimates that speed a reduction of 1mph in built-up areas reduces casualties by 6%. 20mph schemes typically lead to up to 20% fewer casualties.
  6. Better for the environment: 20mph reduces CO2 emissions by 26% and NOx by 28% compared with 30mph and is 50% quieter.
  7. Enforceable, like any speed limit.
  8. Little impact on journey times: The ‘stop-start’ nature of traffic in built up areas is a much more significant factor. Roads can stay at 30mph where the needs of vulnerable road users are met. Bus journeys and timetables times are generally unaffected.
  9. Speed reductions occur, even without regular Police enforcement, to the benefit of all road users. Note: all new car models will have in-car speed limiters from 2022.
  10. Few signs needed: 1 or 2 signs on entry and some repeaters to remind drivers and no need for physical calming.
  11. Sustainable: Ties in closely with other policies to address climate change, improve air quality and enable more people to walk and cycle – especially for short journeys.

Signed schemes and public engagement are cost-effective and offer seven times better value for money than heavily-engineered schemes.

More on Benefits of Wide Area 20mph

  1. Wide area 20mph is 7x more cost effective

benifits

  1. Safer streets for all, particularly children and the elderly

effect of speed

effect of speed2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1. More time to see…

At 20mph your range of vision is greater, enabling you to anticipate danger better.

more time to see.

  1. …and more time to stop

Not only do you see danger earlier, you can stop more quickly.  At the point that a car going at 20mph has stopped, a car at 30mph is still travelling at 24mph.

more time to stop

  1. Promoting healthy lifestyle: better public health, less pollution, better community

promoting health life

Inactivity and pollution are major causes of early death in the UK and 20mph is associated with higher levels of activity.

As well as reducing obesity, heart disease and loneliness, increased walking and cycling reduces pollution, improves sleep patterns (vehicles at 20mph emit 50% less noise than at 30mph), makes people less anxious and more sociable. The elderly and vulnerable retain independent mobility longer, keeping them self-sustaining in daily life which reduces social care costs. Children can play out and learn independent mobility, with less taxi duty for parents and carers. Finally, 20mph enables lifestyle changes, renewed community life and a positive atmosphere. Our towns and villages will be more attractive, liveable and sustainable places.

  1. Enforcement
  • As with any speed limits, 20mph is enforceable. Individual police forces choose to place different priorities on speed management. Some, such as Avon and Somerset and Metropolitan Police are very active; others less so.
  • Even without regular enforcement 20mph limits reduce speeds, collisions and casualties, particularly where there is driver education through community engagement, such as Community Speedwatch.
  • Compliance will increase over time, as drivers become used to 20mph. Compliant drivers effectively become pacer vehicles to enforce 20mph on the traffic behind them.
  • The introduction of “in car speed limiters” – likely to be mandatory on new models from 2022 and all vehicles from 2024 – will further increase compliance without external enforcement. Although drivers can choose to override the limiter, most will welcome the reassurance that they are not breaking the law inadvertently. Vehicles will also have black boxes fitted, which can record the speed limit in the event of a collision, affecting a driver’s liability.
  1. Strengthening the local economy

20mph aids local business as people want to shop, socialise and live in 20mph places. Helps fight the trend to online buying towards the local economy and, in particular, our local high streets and town centres.

  1. Lowering the cost of traffic danger

Road casualties are responsible for the loss of over 2% of GDP. Collisions are predictable and preventable. Introducing a safer system by reducing speed brings down casualties, saves money as well as pain and suffering. The trend towards 20mph is well-established in the UK and other countries. With 20mph coming, don’t let where you live be left behind.

Wide area 20mph limit schemes typically cost no more than £5-6 per head. Where several places are made 20mph, together some costs, such as the Traffic Regulation Order, can be shared. Larger areas tend to be cheaper per person, since they required fewer signs.

20mph is not expensive and the investment cost brings benefits for years; typically it pays back within months. A calculator on the 20’s Plenty website – see example below – can show the cost benefit for your Highway Authority: https://www.20splenty.org/cost_benefit_calculator.

calculator

  1. Signed only limits reduce road speeds

Road safety is improved even without 100% compliance with a 20mph limit. Studies, such as those below show that reductions in average seeds are achieved without physical traffic calming or enforcement and such reductions are greatest on faster roads.  Even relatively small changes in average speed result in significant casualty savings.

Over time, as 20mph limits become more established and in-car speed limiters become more widespread, compliance levels will increase and average speeds reduce further.

CASE STUDY – Bristol

Much of Bristol is now 20 mph. Studies have found that speeds on 94% of surveyed roads had fallen, with an overall 2.7mph reduction in average speeds offering estimated casualty reductions per year of 4.53 fatalities, 11.3 serious injuries and 159.3 slight injuries.

These total an estimated cost saving of over £15 million per year – annual savings over 5 times greater than the one-off roll-out cost of £2.77m mostly funded by Government. Over a ten-year period, 20mph in Bristol will have saved 45 lives, 113 serious injuries, 1,593 minor injuries, and save over £147m net – a fantastic return on a public health investment! It also saves drivers on average £50 per vehicle per year on fuel.

CASE STUDY – Scottish Borders

In a trial involving over 100 communities in the Scottish Borders, speeds were shown to reduce by an average of 3mph, with greater reductions in places with higher pre-speeds.

chartdata

 

 

 

 

 

 

As well as lowering speeds overall, the number of places with higher speeds also reduced.  Before the scheme, locations experiencing average speeds above 28mph fell from over 40 to NONE after implementation.

chart3

CASE STUDY – Faversham

In this historic market town of 20,000 people in Kent, 20’s Plenty for Faversham successfully campaigned for a town-wide 20mph limit, which went live in September 2020.  As well as being popular, speeds reduced by 4 – 5 mph on the faster roads.

Initially opposed by Kent County Council, strength of local support and the technical design showed that it would be more cost-effective to implement a town-wide 20mph speed limit.

Low-cost techniques to reduce traffic speeds were accepted by the highway authority: attractive gateways to the settlement announcing the speed limit change and resident-led ‘Community Corners’, – as planters at key locations.

Faversham

Faversham

Luton Airport Expansion

On November 30th and December 1s, at meetings of The Development Management Committee of Luton Borough Council, the councillors voted 7 to 2 to allow the passenger numbers at the airport to increase from 18 million to 19 million a year. The meeting was attended by many opposition groups, such as Harpenden Sky, St Albans Quieter Skies, Hitchen Forum, Ladacan and a representative of the Hertfordshire Association of Parish and Town Councils, an organisation which we support. They voiced the concerns of many Hertfordshire residents about the noise and pollution levels posed by the current flight numbers and pointed out that legal and binding agreements made by the airport have been consistently broken over the past few years.

It seems that although Luton Council own the airport they are also allowed to make decisions about its expansion. This is a position that is often challenged by the opposition groups, which have consistently argued that these matters should be considered by independent enquiry. Unfortunately, this has not been agreed by government.

Luton Council have also agreed to loan Luton Airport a further £119 million.
More information about the meetings can be found by looking at the Ladacan website, including their checking of the facts given by an expert representing London Luton Airport Operations Ltd, a private consortium which runs the airport day to day.

Christine Nudds, Parish Councillor

On Demand Herts Lynx Bus Service

This project has arrived because of a successful bid of £1.4 million by Herts County Council to the Dept of Transport & funding from Herts County Council(HCC) itself. It is a four year experiment to supplement rural transport mainly as you will see in the North & East of the County, which is  poorly serviced by commercial operators. HCC currently own three vehicles, a fourth in April and a fifth electric one in the summer all to enable an expanded service.

The more it will be used the likelier it will be to be a permanent feature

Parish Litter Bins

It has come to our attention that the parish litter bins are being filled with residents’ household waste, such as dirty nappies and dog waste bags. The parish litter bins are intended to be used to keep the village clean and tidy and to prevent our wildlife from being poisoned.

The parish bins are not to be used for household waste.

There are dog waste bins provided throughout the village, and residents have their own recycling and household waste bins which are emptied frequently. We would kindly ask that the parish bins are not used for household waste or dog waste; please use the dog waste bins and household waste bins provided.

London Luton Airport, Consultation on Arrivals Flight Paths

Re : London Luton Airport, Consultation on Arrivals Flight Paths

Dear Sir/Madam

Walkern Parish Council would like to state clearly that it strongly objects to any expansion of Luton Airport.
Having looked at the proposed option for Westerly Winds Arrivals, which is 70% of arrivals to Luton Airport, dispersed tracks need to be considered as we stated in our previous response to the proposed increase in passenger numbers dated 9th November 2020.

Clearly it is fairer and more equitable that the noise and pollution from arriving aircraft should be spread over the greatest possible area, largely over open countryside, not over concentrated populations. In a normal year, especially in the Summer months, the noise from aircraft on their landing approach make it difficult to sleep or have a window open. During the day you cannot have a conversation with a person standing right next to you.

The jettison of fuel is obnoxious and highly pollutant, which raises additional concern as there is a primary school on the flightpath.

The fact that the preferred option of the Airport is to channel arrivals into a narrower approach is irrelevant, as it is they who are the cause of the problem.

The London Luton Airport Authority state that this is a safety issue, because they want to expand passenger numbers. Again, this would not be an issue if they keep to the 18 million limit which was democratically agreed and legally signed up to by all parties in 2013 and expected to hold to 2028.

This consultation seems to assume that numbers of aircraft will increase and therefore plans need to be made regarding their approach to Luton. It is clear that, until the long-term effects of the Covid-19 Pandemic on the economy are more clearly known, no such assumption should be made.

Yours faithfully
on behalf of Walkern Parish Council

Heidi Broady
Clerk to Walkern Parish Council

LLAOL Consultation

Dear Sir/Madam

Re:  Consultation on Expansion of Passenger Numbers from 18 mppa to 19 mppa – LLA

Walkern Parish Council would like to state clearly that it strongly objects to any expansion of passenger number at Luton Airport.  This means breaking through the 18 million limit which was democratically agreed and legally signed up to by all parties in 2013 and expected to hold until 2028.

Financial incentives from Luton Council led to a faster than predicted growth and last year the airport reached and nearly breached the 18 million limit.  This makes it clear that any agreement made by the airport is hardly likely to be kept, even when it is a legal document.

The airport has knowingly breached its noise footprint limits for three years in a row but rather than try to keep within the limits, has applied to have the limits increased.  Despite a legal commitment to scrutinise the airport’s performance against the noise control scheme, Luton Council ignored the fact that the noise conditions were breached and the airport failed to explain the breach.  Neither can be trusted.  The so called ‘less noisy’ aircraft are actually larger and noisier.

The impact on the village of Walkern from noise is devastating, especially in the summer months, when aircraft on their landing approach make it difficult to sleep or even have a window open.

The jettisoning of fuel is obnoxious and highly pollutant, which raises additional concern as there is a primary school on the flightpath.

The Parish Council cannot believe that a slight deviation to North or South of the existing flight path, over open countryside instead of our village, would have a detrimental effect on the airport’s operation.  Likewise, a steeper approach at a higher altitude would reduce noise levels.

The only reason the airport has been compliant with planning limits in 2020 is due to the reduction in passenger numbers as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic.   It is clear that a reduction in passenger numbers is required until the long-term effects of the virus on the economy is more clearly known.

Yours faithfully
on behalf of Walkern Parish Council

Heidi Broady (Mrs)
Clerk to Walkern Parish Council

 

Box Wood – Latest Update

Boxwood is now listed as an Asset of Community Value by East Herts District Council on behalf of Friends of Fairlands Farm Community Interest Company.

 

Successful Nominations

Reference Name & Address of Property Nominee Date Listed Expiry Date
ACv 19/08 Boxwood, Stevenage Road, Walkern Friends of Fairlands Farm Community Interest Company 27/07/2020 26/07/2025

Box Wood – Article 4 Direction

An Article 4 Direction was served on 22 July 2020 at Box Wood, north of Stevenage Road, following the potential sale/purchase of these land parcels which were advertised as sub-divided plots.

EHDC were concerned that this increased the possibility of harmful development, such as fences, new accesses and temporary use of the land, within the Metropolitan Green Belt, as well as to the Site of Archaeological Significance, the Wildlife Site and Ancient Monument which are all designated within this land at Box Wood. The Direction removes these permitted development rights. It requires landowners to seek planning permission and creates the opportunity for EHDC to take enforcement action if any breaches occur.

About Article 4 Directions

An Article 4 Direction enables greater management of planning related changes in a particular location. They work by removing permitted development rights over certain works.

This means that planning permission is required for specific developments that would otherwise not require an application for planning permission, enabling the Council to better protect the character or land use in a specific location or area.

Walkern Parish Council would like to thanks District Councillor Ken Crofton for all his hard work in making this happen.

Update on Boxwood

Walkern Parish Council was delighted to receive notification from East Herts District Council that a Tree Preservation Order (TPO) has been made for all the trees in the Box Wood location which could be affected by the proposed sale. New TPO’s remain provisional until they have been confirmed and they cannot be confirmed until any objections have been fully considered. The objection period for TPO639 runs until 12th August.

We would like to thank District Councillor Ken Crofton for supporting us with this.

Box Wood Stevenage

Walkern Parish Council is aware of the situation at Box Wood Stevenage.

We are adamant that this important part of rural Hertfordshire should be protected from all types of development and to this end we are working closely with Sir Oliver Heald MP, District Councillor Ken Crofton and officers within East Herts District Council to protect this important site.

We will update on our progress in the near future.